Blue Yeti Pro has a higher sample bit rate (192 kHz) than the standard version, resulting in a more enjoyable audio experience. The sound quality of the recordings made by each model is the most significant issue between the two.
Blue Yeti X Vs. Blue Yeti Pro
The Blue Yeti X model’s sound quality is noticeably reduced in comparison to the Blue Yeti Pro model’s high-resolution, higher sound quality recordings. This is the primary difference between the two Blue Yeti devices. With a bit rate of 24 bits/48 kHz, the Blue Yeti X offers a larger sample bit rate than the Blue Yeti Pro, which is 24 bits/192 kHz.
What exactly is the Blue Yeti X, and how does it work?
Compared to the original Blue Yeti model, the Blue Yeti X has four condenser capsules that enhance the quality of all audio recordings. In addition to the LED meter, the Yeti X model has additional upgrades, such as the ability to see whether one’s voice is too high or low for the optimal recording.
The Cardioid and Omnidirectional modes are included in this product’s four modes of operation. Allows users to effortlessly switch between gain, headphone and mix modes using a clever knob
Another advantage of the Yeti X model is its inexpensive pricing. This product is a profitable, adaptable, and high-quality alternative to the other Yeti models on the market.
What is the Blue Yeti Pro?
As a result, the Blue Yeti Pro microphone was released and advertised as one of Blue’s most high-end options. Recording high-quality audio at a sample rate of 24 bits/192 kHz, it satisfies these promises. This USB microphone is often regarded as the best on the market.
With three condenser capsules, the Blue Yeti Pro variant is capable of capturing high-quality recordings. In addition, it has a single-to-noise-ratio of 114 dB and a frequency response of 15 Hz-22 Hz. With four polar patterns, the Yeti Pro is able to cover a wide range of applications.
Due to its status as a “luxury” model, the microphone is more expensive. The Blue Yeti Pro model is one of the most flexible microphones now on the market..
Difference Between Blue Yeti X and Blue Yeti Pro
- When compared to high-resolution audio recording capabilities of the other model, the former produces audio recordings with a lower level of quality. In each model, the bit rate is different. Sample rates of 24 bits/192kHz are available on the Blue Yeti Pro, but only on the Blue Yeti X.
- When it comes to condenser capsules, the Blue Yeti X model contains four, compared to the three in the Blue Yeti Pro model.
- It is more difficult to move the heavier Blue Yeti X. While the first model is little heavier at roughly 1.2 pounds, the second model is slightly lighter at around 1.14 pounds.
- A desktop stand is included with the purchase of a Blue Yeti X model. The Blue Yeti Pro bundle does not come with this extra feature.
- Each version has a distinct signal-to-noise ratio. In comparison to the Blue Yeti Pro, the Blue Yeti X has an SNR rating of 100 dB.
- Each USB microphone has a different frequency response range. There is a 15 Hz-22 Hz frequency response range in the Blue Yeti Pro, and a 20 Hz-20 kHz frequency response range in the Blue Yeti X.
- The two types have quite different power needs. In contrast to the Blue Yeti Pro, the Blue Yeti X model has a power need range of 62mA-203mA.
- Each model has a separate pricing point on the open market. Even though the Blue Yeti Pro USB microphone model is one of the most expensive, the Blue Yeti X model is a more inexpensive option.
There are a lot of similarities between the design and functions of the Blue Yeti X and Blue Yeti Pro variants. Cardioid and Omnidirectional polar patterns are available and function inside the mono stereo sound field of the two devices. However, there is a noticeable difference between the two.
The sound quality provided by each USB microphone model differs significantly, and this is the most fundamental difference. The sample bit rate of the Blue Yeti X model is less sophisticated than that of the Blue Yeti Pro model. This model outperforms the Yeti X variation at 24 bit/192 kHz.
As a result, the two products have different market pricing points, condensation capsules, frequency response ranges, and power needs. Dissimilarities between the two models must be considered in order to make an educated choice.